<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3.times { ERH Links }</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ditchnet.org/wp/2007/02/07/3times-erh-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ditchnet.org/wp/2007/02/07/3times-erh-links/</link>
	<description>XML, Cocoa, JavaScript, Java and other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skade</title>
		<link>http://www.ditchnet.org/wp/2007/02/07/3times-erh-links/#comment-265406</link>
		<dc:creator>Skade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ditchnet.org/wp/2007/02/07/3times-erh-links/#comment-265406</guid>
		<description>Ruby is not more object-orientated as Java because you can call Methods on ordinary numbers.

You can do so in Java:

Integer a = new Integer(2); //a nice Integer Object

The Difference between Java and Ruby is the _everything_ in Ruby is a first-Class Object. Even  Classes. Classes in Java are a strange Bastard in between, hidden behind a cumbersome API called 'Reflection'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruby is not more object-orientated as Java because you can call Methods on ordinary numbers.</p>
<p>You can do so in Java:</p>
<p>Integer a = new Integer(2); //a nice Integer Object</p>
<p>The Difference between Java and Ruby is the _everything_ in Ruby is a first-Class Object. Even  Classes. Classes in Java are a strange Bastard in between, hidden behind a cumbersome API called &#8216;Reflection&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
